Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Awwwww.... Sparky's got a sock-puppet stalker!


There's now two individuals posting replies here under the handle "Sparky". One (a regular) has been on blogger since 2007.

The other (posting from the same I.P. address as the infamous Patrick Ross), has been on blogger since 2009.

Dishonesty? An entirely new level of strawman slaying? We report, you decide.


59 comments:

Sparky said...

y'know, I'd feel slightly worried with regards to my family's safety considering how much Patrick Ross appears to be thinking about me, posting about me and stalking me on-line...
However, since he has this 'Rossian' way of interpreting facts, if he ever tried to find my place o' residence, he'd probably end up in Ontario, California.
I won't lose any sleep over Patrick's shenanigans.

Sparky said...

Heh. You caught me. It was fun while it lasted. But you learn such interesting things.

So, Sparkles. Riddle me this.

Does it alarm you that your cohorts wouldn't so much as bat an eyebrow at you calling an ethnic conservative an uncle tom?

I think it's fairly illustrative.

Patrick Ross said...

Or, rather, I should say, your cohorts didn't so much as bat an eyelash at the idea that you would call an ethnic conservative an uncle tom.

Why, Sparky, I almost think that they think you're a racist and they're OK with it.

Audrey II said...

What on earth are you blabbering about Patsparky?

Look! Over there! A shiny object that I think might just distract from my having been caught in my own dishonest glory! /rhetoricofassholery

Sparky said...

Seek help, Patrick

Patrick Ross said...

It's called "subterfuge", Audrey. And I was rather intrigued by what it helped to uncover.

Trust me on this, Sparky: I don't need any help at all.

You, on the other hand. You need a lot of help. And you don't even seem to know it just yet.

Sparky said...

Yeah, I'm the one impersonating other people...
Oh wait, no. That'd be you. And the ludicrous concept that I would actually use any racial slurs at all... My god you're an idiot.
For what end, Patrick? Seriously, what in your addleminded little brain did you think you'd accomplish with such a stunt? I mean, the rest of us already know you don't have a clue what truth is, or how to interpret a given set of criteria to form a logical conclusion--you've already demonstrated that over and over again. So what, pray tell, did you think you were accomplishing?
And once again you project--
"You, on the other hand. You need a lot of help. And you don't even seem to know it just yet."
Your level of self unawareness just shot skyrocketed. 'Stealing' my blog name and making me out to be a racist? (at least, that's what you were inferring 'cause I haven't seen any other actual comments by pseudo-Sparky besides here).
Grow up. Seek help. Take a vacation from the keyboard because you seriously need to get out.
Or you can continue on your path of abject failure.

Patrick Ross said...

Really, Sparkles, really?

Your friends don't seem to think it's all that sucking that you'd use a racial slur. In fact, "liberal supporter"'s defense for it was "WELL, CONSERVATIVES DO IT, TOO!!!" (more or less).

Judging from their response, they didn't seem to think it was out of character for you.

Does that distress you?

Patrick Ross said...

And one more point, Sparky:

It's your good friend Robert Perer John Day who can't seem to leave people's families out of his personal feuds.

Everyone still remembers him targetting Richard Evans' kids.

Audrey II said...

The Rhetoric of Assholery: For times when you desperately need something to distract from having been caught red-handed, dishonestly impersonating others / trying to pass off your inflammatory comments as theirs!

How bloody pathetic.

It takes your entire strawman slaying routine to an entirely new level of assholishness. This little incident ought to do wonders for the online HR google trail that you're establishing, as there is nothing that employers love more than a proclivity for fraudulent impersonation of others, much less the stubborn effort to justify such garbage.

Sparky (the real one) is right, Pat. Seek help.

Patrick Ross said...

LOL!

If anything, Audrey, your descriptions of the "Rhetoric of Assholery" has been nothing more than a distraction when you've gotten yourself intellectually cornered.

(Which, seeing as how you basically choose to live in an intellectual corner, tends to happen on a hilariously constant basis.)

Apparently, it has yet to occur to you that I fully expected to get caught eventually. As to what Sparky thought I would accomplish with this "stunt", it's rather simple:

I fully expected people like yourself to confirm what I've been saying all along: that you'll excuse absolutely anything in the name of ideological solidarity.

As for "seeking help" -- believe me, I'm good.

Sparky said...

Nothing you have ever done distresses me, Patrick
Almost everything you've done and said outside your little nexus demonstrates quite clearly that you're really not worth that kind of effort.
It just adds one more item in your litany of foolishness and hackery.
At least there's consistency in the universe--you chose the path of abject failure.

Patrick Ross said...

LOL

And yet you expend that kind of effort, Sparkles.

Why is that?

And it doesn't distress you that your friends don't seem phased by the notion you would label an ethnic conservative an "uncle tom"?

If that's your way of confirming everything I've ever suspected about you, I think you just convinced me.

Sparky said...

Once again Patrick wants to make this thread all about what he wants to make it about, instead of what it actually is about--how Patrick once again demonstrates he's a disingenuous lying and deceitful hack who will do anything to score a 'win' in his own little world.
And once again he projects with the 'confiriming everything I've ever suspected about you'. To wit--posing and posting as someone else 'on the other side' to score cheap points speaks volumes as to your character, Patrick.
Moreover, my friends know I wouldn't ever use racial slurs 'cause, well, I'm not a racist.
That then begs the question, Patrick--you apparently wrote ('cause, well, there's no actual links to whatever you wrote as pseudo-Sparky here and I'm not bothering to track down your idiocy) some racial slurs. How'd that make you feel? You apparently wrote those words (no matter what persona you used when writing them), you own them. So Patrick, racist much?
I also find it sadly amusing that the guy who in one very recent thread accused me of being a bully--or a bully's toady--can then turn around the very next week and do what you just did. Just one more example of everything the rest of us ever suspected about you.
Abject failure indeed.

Audrey II said...

Patrick Ross dishonestly creates a sock-puppet blogger account designed deceive others into believing that his words are actually coming from another individual.

Patrick Ross then uses this sock-puppet account to engage in provocateurism, posting inflammatory commentary in the hopes of dishonestly passing it off as the work of someone else.

Patrick Ross's efforts at identity theft and bomb throwing are ignored.

Patrick Ross forgets to sign out of his sock-puppet account and mistakenly posts something that reveals his dishonestly, despite attempting to cover his tracks by deleting the mis-posted comment.

Patrick Ross declares his master plan to have been a success and goes into full damage-control mode. Look! Over there! A lack of response to me attempting to put words in your mouth! Enough about his moral bankruptcy, you (and by you, he's referring to his sock-puppet efforts to fraudulently post on your behalf) are a racist!

"Abject Failure" is pretty much spot on, Sparky.

Patrick Ross said...

LOL

"Sparky" isn't much of an identity so steal, or even to borrow.

But the general reaction to the notion that Sparky would utter a racial slur was more than simply "ignoring" it. It was excusing it via "well, they do it, too!" type argumentation.

Face it, Sparkles, your friends seem to suspect that you may well be a racist.

Gee, I wouldn't be comfortable with that either, if I were you.

Sparky said...

So this is what the feckless coward was up to.
See, Patrick hasn't won at anything in the 'whole of the blogosphere', so he decided to engage in some form of duplicity in order to score some cheap shot at, well, me.
Moreover, the idiot was too, well, idiotic, to realize that he was still posting as pseudo-sparky when he commented here.
Once busted, it's all 'ha ha--I meant to do that'...
And when pressed on it, he's all 'gee, your friends think you are a racist!'
And when asked what he hoped to accomplish, well, of corse he wasn't going to answer honestly so whatever.
Here's the thing--
Patrick allegedly posted racial slurs. It matters not that he was using an alias-what matters is that he owns whatever words he posted.
Moreover, it doesn't matter how people responded to those words--Patrick posted them. Not me, not Audrey, not cc or Dawg or even 'liberal supporter'--Patrick Ross posted them.
And for a guy that's now all 'isn't much of an identity so [sic] steal, or even borrow', he did it anyway, thus adding to his idiocy and hackery.
On a more meta level, Patrick is now trolling for a response that he's failing to get. See, he closely watched the goings on between Dr. Dawg and "Raphael Alexander" to see what the fallout would be.
In Patrick's addleminded brain, he was probably hoping that I'd be so incensed at his little idiocy that I'd a) out myself on this here blogosphere (as if I'm not already) and therefore b) take this to the next level and get lawyers involved.
See, what Patrick fails to understand is something I've stated from the very begining--it doesn't matter what Patrick thinks about me, or, for that matter, what these 'friends' that Patrick thinks I have in this here blogosphere think of me. All that really does matter is the truth. And that's something that Patrick, with all his disingenous hackery, with all his deceit and lying, with all his goal post moving, with, in essense, all his triangles and pseudo-sparky's out the yin-yang, just doesn't have.
Really sucks to be Patrick--when has he ever been right about anything?
I supported Dawg with his forray into the legal-sphere with regards to RA's defamation. RA's words, left unchallenged, may, and probably would, have had a negative impact on Dawg's real life.
Patrick Ross, in allegedly posting his little racist diatribes as pseudo-sparky, or for that matter, any of his general crapulence posted here as well as elsewhere, affects my personal/professional my life not one iota.
Speaking of which, Patrick, are you so ashamed of what you did that you're not willing to provide links to your little one-act play?
In the end, as usual, I'm takin' the high road. Of course, when dealing with Patrick, the 'high road' can be at ground level.
Go on, Patrick, continue to piss into the wind.

Malcolm+ said...

Patrick is clearly a very troubled young man with severe emotional problems.

Patrick Ross said...

LOL

Sparky, you can cry, wail and gnash your teeth until the cows come home. Maybe the ideologically-motivated clowns who frequent this site will buy it, but you and I both know that no rational individual ever will.

I'm not the slightest bit embarrassed or ashamed at having revealled this little nugget regarding what your "friends" really think of you.

But you... you really do seem rather troubled by it. And I can't say that I blame you. Reality bites, and all that.

Sparky said...

I can barely hear you from up here, Patrick

sassy said...

Sparky, you can cry, wail and gnash your teeth until the cows come home ???

That's quite an imagination you have there Patrick Sparky Ross – either that or projection.

Patrick Ross said...

Sure, Sparkles, sure.

Will it comfort you if I at least pretend to believe that?

Sparky said...

As usual, Patrick, you can (and will) pretend whatever you want. You've demonstrated quite conclusively that you live in a world of make-believe.
Yep, is pretty easy taking the high road when you're involved.

Patrick Ross said...

Right.

I live in a world of make believe.

Project much, Sparkles?

(By the way, your friends seem to be comfortable thinking you're a racist.)

Sparky said...

Oh no projection, Patrick. Just something you've never understood--the truth.
Here's something for ya--a blast from the past, as it were...
"See, kids, this has all been terribly amusing. But at a certain point you have to be able to defend your arguments on something other than your own say-so.
. . .
But what you need to understand is that no one is obligated to respect beliefs you can't support or defend.
"
Wanna project some more, Patrick? 'Cause there's a litany of comments that demonstrate your complete lack of self awareness.
The air is clear up here...

Patrick Ross said...

Sparkles, you wouldn't know the truth if it came up to you in public and called you an Uncle Tom.

You've demonstrated this over and over again.

In fact, I've never in my life encountered anyone who lives in a fantasy world as much as you do.

Sparky said...

Who are you trying to convince, Patrick? 'Cause it's only you that you're persuading with your idiocy. Everyone else here knows the truth. And brandishing the term 'uncle tom' around--my you seem awfully comfortable using that. One would almost think you're a racist seeing as how you like to talk about it so much.
And with Patrick thoroughly proving his complete and utter irrelevancy, I think we're pretty much through here.
Patrick won't be 'cause he still hasn't got the conversation he was pining for. Instead, once again he had his ass handed to him. And, once again, it was by his own idiocy.
Living in a fantasy world, indeed.

Patrick Ross said...

Really, Sparkles? Really?

Here I've been wondering all along who it is that you've being trying to convince.

Mind you, I'm sure life is a lot easier if you never think for yourself, hide behind the neighbourhood bully, and never strive to produce anything of any value.

In other words, living precisely the way that you do.

Now, there are two things you seem to be able to do passably well: bloviate, and pretend that your bloviation actually proves anything.

But now I know something about you -- or, rather, about the way your friends see you.

And we all know it's that new little speck of self-knowledge that really has you so apoplectic.

Audrey II said...

Really,Sparkles? Really? Really really? Really really really really really really really?

You clearly are dishonest. PatSparky's master plan obviously has won.

Phase 1: Create sock-puppet accounts in order to fraudulently post comments as another person

Phase 3: Victory!

Motherfucker, don't you know there is only one true Patrick Ross? That is none other than the Diamond Kid. That is none other than Kid Cash. That is none other than the Mindbender, Tha Flamethrower, the Regicide Kid, or Thunderbolt Ross. That is none other than the real life living legend himself...

Kid, don't you KNOW?>

Sparky said...

yeah, I'm all apoplectic!
All my buddies here are calling me 'racist!' now...
Oh wait, no.
According to his very self, It was Patrick Ross that posted racially charged comments. It was Patrick Ross that posted 'uncle tom' quotes and basked in the aftermath...
And he was such an 'undercover provocateur' that he fergot to sign out as pseudo-sparky, thus compounding his idiocy.
Yep--he sure showed me!

Audrey II said...

Patrick Ross defeating Patrick Ross. Haven't we seen this gift-that-keeps-on-giving movie before?

Hell, pass the popcorn. Idiocy like that never gets old.

KEvron said...

the only thing thing you need to complete the effect, twats, are some yellow triang....er, octagons on the soles of your shoes.

you have absolutely no dignity, you mulleted fuck.

KEvron, aka KEvron

Patrick Ross said...

Wow, Audrey. You evidently sure spent a lot of time on me.

So this is your new tactic? Trying to embarrass me by digging up examples where I schooled other twits just as dismal as yourself?

Yep. That'll show me.

Audrey II said...

The search to find that particular example of adolescent, chest-thumping buffoonery took all of a few seconds. It's certainly within the reach of any HR employee capable of accessing google.

As for "showing you", that would involve a degree of self-awareness that I think you've illustrated repeatedly does not exist. I'm more interested in reaching a slightly more intellectually mature audience. Best wishes in reaching yours, "Tha Flamethrower".

Patrick Ross said...

LOL!

Sure it, did, Audrey.

It really just confirms to me how very deeply I've evidently gotten to you that you've become so futilely vindictive as to parrot Robert Peter John Day's "we'll destroy your professional life because we're sore losers" nonsense.

Well, Robbie boy failed. I wonder what it is, precisely, that makes you think you'll fare so much as one iota better.

But, it really doesn't matter. You're just a bitter nobody, reacting to defeat just like bitter nobodies do. And in imagining yourself to be powerful enough to destroy somebody's career simply because they defeated you in numerous debates, you're really just showing a severe disconnect from reality.

I'm currently obsenely well-employed, and I severely doubt that I'll be fired because I was mean to intellectually inferior people on the internet.

Nor do I imagine that I'll not get my next job because I treated people like you with the kind of disdain that you deserve.

But I'm very amused by this notion of an "intellectually mature audience". Your blog is a series of one-line and one-paragraph posts essentially calling people that you disagree with -- or who disagree with you -- stupid.

If you really wanted an "intellectually mature" audience, I would suspect that, every so often, maybe you'd have a real, honest-to-god idea to write about -- that maybe, at some point, you'd have something to say.

If by "intellectually mature" you mean people who are so dogmatically hateful of people who disagree with them, I'd say you hit the motherlode with useless clowns like Sparky.

Audrey II said...

"It really just confirms to me how very deeply I've evidently gotten to you that you've become so futilely vindictive as to..."

...fraudulently create a sock-puppet account to dishonestly pass off my words as yours? Not quite.

"we'll destroy your professional life because we're sore losers""

The "destroying" has all been courtesy of you, Pat. I've done nothing except draw attention to to your dishonesty and adolescent bluster.

"You're just a bitter nobody, reacting to defeat just like bitter nobodies do."

Well, I wholeheartedly admit that I'm not the "somebody" that Tha Flamethrower aka Kid Cash aka Diamond Kid aka Thunderbolt Ross aka Sparky might be, but the "defeat" here has been all yours. You lied about your identity, you did it as part of a disingenuous effort to post your words in others' mouths, and now you're back to the same old "look, over there" Rhetoric of Assholery routine that you've made your name synonymous with.

Your blogging advice has, as always, been appropriately filed under "If I ever want to be like Patrick Ross...". In the meantime, I'm quite content with being a "nobody-according-to-The-Regicide-Kid". Lack-of-self-awareness FTW!

Patrick Ross said...

LOL

If you say so, Audrey.

I suppose it never occurred to you that, from the very beginning of that little subterfuge, that I fully expected to be caught at some point.

So you want to insist that the defeat is all mine.

Considering that I got the opportunity to reveal the concern of your cohorts with racism to be entirely hollow, my subterfuge was successful.

I suggest you read a little deeper into the thinking of Tolkien, then come back and tell the rest of us what you have when you achieve your objective.

Sparky said...

Dogmatically hateful? Yeah, that's as true as your triangles.
Let's see if we can jog your very limited memory--there has been more than once where I commented at your very nexus in which I stated without equivocation that you wrote some good blog posts.
Dogmatic? Yeah whatever.
And let's also not forget who here wrote racially charged comments.
You're such a useless tool.
And with that, Patrick puts yet one more nail in his coffin of utter irrelevancy.
Have at it, Patrick.

Audrey II said...

I love the degree of self-unawareness that can declare getting caught fraudulently assuming a false identity to dishonestly attempt to put words in someone else's mouth a "defeat" for others.

You've revealed a lot, Pat: Depravity, moral bankruptcy, logical incoherence, desperation, and a penchant for bluster when all else has failed. Please do keep declaring "victory". It adds another entire level of hilarity to this whole pathetic incident.

Patrick Ross said...

Sure, Sparky, sure.

And your friends didn't seem even the slightest bit perturbed at the notion that you would utter a racial ephithet.

It seems to me that your friends have seen in you what a lot of other people have seen: that ugly little dogmatic bigot stirring just under the surface, where you try so hard to hide him.

So keep ranting, Sparkles. I rather enjoy watching you slither.

Audrey II said...

Except that Sparky didn't utter a racial "ephithet" (sic). You did, under a fraudulent identity in an admitted attempt to deceive. And like the Sûreté du Québec, you were unable to provoke others into doing the same. All you're left with now is crowing about your own dishonest failure.

You've made it pretty obvious who's "slithering" here, SparkyPatThunderboltCashRegicideKid.

Patrick Ross said...

Yawn.

Right. Provoking one of Sparkles' fellow intellectually-inferior serial annoyances into offering a "but they're racist, too!" defense and thus reveal the disingenuity of the far left's preoccupation with racism is a "failure".

I achieved my objective. That means I win. This isn't that hard to understand.

M@ said...

So Patrick created a fake user ID to mimic an existing user ID, and with that ID, posted racist comments. His conclusion: the existing, mimicked ID is a racist.

I also remember that Richard Evans created a fake URL that mimicked the existing URL of one of his critics (canadiancynic.net). He redirected this URL to NAMBLA, thereby providing traffic to, and therefore supporting, NAMBLA. His conclusion: the existing, mimicked person, Canadian Cynic, is a pedophile.

So my question: did you guys do some kind of course together or something? It's just a little too eerie to think this happened by chance.

KEvron said...

audrey,

i admire your determination, but you need to understand that twatky is trolling you, in the classic sense. just as you have green hair, so, too, are octagons actually triangles.

twats is a miserable, lonely lump, and rightly so. best to leave in that state, and better to address his trespasses obliquely, rather than directly with him; talk about him, but not to him. of course, you're free to choose whatever course of action you prefer.

KEvron

Frank Frink said...

Twatrick could save everyone (including himself) a whole lot of 'trouble' by creating a new blogger profile by the name of 'LOL!'

Works for me.

KEvron said...

"lonely, ostracized lump"?

KEvron

wv = "sympunsi". i'll be conducting, of course.

Patrick Ross said...

Holy shit, it's Frank Frink.

I literally forgot you exist. I mean, again.

"So Patrick created a fake user ID to mimic an existing user ID, and with that ID, posted racist comments. His conclusion: the existing, mimicked ID is a racist."

Hey. Anybody remember what it is Audrey says about arguments like this?

No, Matt. That's not the argument at all. The argument is that the weak excuse offered by some of Sparkles' friends suggests that they're more than comfortable with the idea that Sparkles is a racist.

Maybe even more than a little unsurprised by it.

"I also remember that Richard Evans created a fake URL that mimicked the existing URL of one of his critics (canadiancynic.net). He redirected this URL to NAMBLA, thereby providing traffic to, and therefore supporting, NAMBLA. His conclusion: the existing, mimicked person, Canadian Cynic, is a pedophile."

That's an interesting argument, Matt, but that isn't the whole story at all... at least as it was explained to me.

I think you're missing something about Robert Peter John Day's alleged position on the age of consent. Either that, or you could just as easily dispell that particular rumour, as I've never been able to confirm it for myself.

As far as whatever association I have with Richard Evans, I have none. Last time I checked, he was angry at me because I criticized him for posting Robbie Day's phone number and address.

KEvron said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
KEvron said...

"As far as whatever association I have with Richard Evans, I have none."'

with anyone, for that matter, lumpy.

KEvron

Patrick Ross said...

Now, now, Kevvy.

Don't be bitter just because I don't return your phone calls.

KEvron said...

you just have, lumpy.

KEvron

Frank Frink said...

I'm currently obsenely well-employed

Glad to hear that, Twatsy considering Alberta is shedding jobs at a faster rate then anywhere else in the ROC.

Good for you that spelling ability isn't one of the qualifications.

Fries with that?

wv = "vadici". Hmm... not quite Latin or Italian. Maybe it's an ancient Calabrese curse for a visitation of boils.

Sparky said...

Let us disect another one of Patrick's flawed arguments.
We shall start here, with a truthful summation from Frank--
""So Patrick created a fake user ID to mimic an existing user ID, and with that ID, posted racist comments. His conclusion: the existing, mimicked ID is a racist."
At which point, the self unawate idiot states, "No, Matt. That's not the argument at all. The argument is that the weak excuse offered by some of Sparkles' friends suggests that they're more than comfortable with the idea that Sparkles is a racist."
And let us now take Patrick's own words and, once again, smack him over the head (traingle, triangle, triangle)--
"And your friends didn't seem even the slightest bit perturbed at the notion that you would utter a racial ephithet.

It seems to me that your friends have seen in you what a lot of other people have seen: that ugly little dogmatic bigot stirring just under the surface, where you try so hard to hide him.
"
Looks to me, Patrick, that you're calling me a racist--'dogmatic bigot stirring under the surface'...
With all your other standard obfuscations ("what I was really doing was...") just aren't working.
And once again, I'll call on you to back up that idioct. And once again you won't.
So we're left with Patrick posting racial comments and, well, lying about it. The obtuse idiot can't even keep his story straight in one comment thread.
As predictable as ever

Patrick Ross said...

Yawn.

Sparky, it's my personal opinion of you that you're likely a bigot. Your friends' reaction to that notion suggests to me that they're perfectly comfortable with that.

Are you finished yet? You've been boring me here for about a day now.

Audrey II said...

Kev,

"i admire your determination, but you need to understand that twatky is trolling you, in the classic sense."

I do understand that. What I struggle with is the issue of the utility of it. What is the opportunity cost of not drawing attention to the assholery of it all? What is lost by not giving him an additional forum in which to embarrass himself? Am I being naive in thinking there's something to be gained by giving DiamondCashThunderboltPatSparkyThaRegicideKid all the rope he can make use of?

Take this thread as an example. By addressing "Thunderbolt" directly, he's now claiming that his having been caught fraudulently assuming a false identity for the purposes of posting bigoted commentary is a "win" for him. That sort of self-inflicted-wounding seems to me to be a gift that keeps on giving. And wasn't it through direct dialogue that Patrick Ross' infamous they're-triangles and there-will-be-no-deficit claims emerged?

KEvron said...

"Am I being naive....?"

i really didn't mean to suggest that, and i apologize if i gave that impression. there is a point, however, that the direct approach becomes an exercise in futility, and that point is reached quickly when dealing with someone like lumpy. he lacks shame and dignity, and delights in flaunting these defects. not that there isn't an upside to it; those of us with a healthy sense of propriety can take pride in our reproach of his shameless, onanistic antics.

"And wasn't it through direct dialogue that Patrick Ross' infamous they're-triangles and there-will-be-no-deficit claims emerged?"

couldn't say for sure. verges on proving a negative. both instances could have been handled without direct confrontation. in the end, though, what was really gained? he remains a tragically flawed individual who continues to delight in sowing frustration, regardless of whether it takes root or not.

nothing lost, either, as long as we keep in mind that it's all just ones and ohs.

KEvron

Sparky said...

In the end, the frustration is Patricks and Patricks alone.
Frustrated that no one takes him really, really, really seriously.
Frustrated that he can't for the life of him win anything outside his little nexus.
Frustrated that he gets schooled by his own words.
God that's gotta get him down...
The more important point is that Patrick posted racially charged comments and he seems to be quite alright with it. This has exceeded the usual idiocy of Patrick--triangles, deficits, "the whole of the blogosphere", MSNBC is exactly like FOX--and has reached a whole new level. Patrick is wallowing in his own alleged racism. He tries to deflect it by saying 'I posted it as you!!' but, in the end, his words--he owns them.

Sparky said...

Just a small minor point that once again proves every point we ever knew about Patrick...
Let's go into the 'wayback machine'--
From the comment section elsewhere at this blog,
"And then Sparkles swings by again to protest too fucking much.
You waited three days after my last response to swing by here and try to get the last word -- just like I knew you would.
People as pathetic as yourself tend to be predictable.
"
Quoted verbatim from the 'tard.
I pointed out that, hey, I was AFK for the weekend. Patrick was having none of that, however--this was one more 'win' for the Rossman-. See, he expects that we're waiting--constantly clicking 'refresh'--to see what pearls o' wisdom he may post in these various threads...
And let's see how predictably we can hang Patrick with is own words...
"Patrick Ross said...
. . .
November 4, 2009 10:11 PM
"
And his next post--
"Patrick Ross said...
. . .
November 7, 2009 4:29 PM
"
OMG!!! Over the weekend to boot!!! I am aghast!! Patrick didn't post any rebuttals over the weekend!!!
God what a useless tool. Let us now see how predictable he will be when he justifies his behaviour. Let us see in full splendour how Patrick will get out of this one. Once again, Patricks own words used to beat him over the head.
And let us be perfectly clear--I don't care if comments don't get posted over the weekend. This is Patrick's big thing--he wants his response and he wants it now!!! (ADD maybe?) And if you delay, well, then you're a 'tard just trying to get in 'the last word' (another one of his games). If he delays, I'm sure there'll be a justification for it. Let's see if 'false equivalence' will be his argument of choice...
See, IOKIYPR. It always is...

thwap said...

LOL!!!!!!!!!11!!!1!!11!!!!!

Post a Comment